القضاء الفرنسي يحكم ببطلان الدعوي المرفوعة من عبد الله بولا ونجاة ضد خالد الحاج

[معتصم الطاهر]

خالد
يا خــــــــــــــــال ..
مبسوط ..
وفرح ..

و كل الكان فى يدنا .. نؤيد وندعم و نتصل و نسأل ..و بس ..

و هذا ليس ما مفروض ..
يعنى ..
تجدنا ان شاء الله فى الأفراح .. عرس جعفر ..مثلا ..

[أمير الشعراني]

[frame="7 80"]يحيا العدل
مبروك يا خال
ومبروك لأسرة سودانيات
ومبروك لكل الإخوة الذين ساندوا الخال ودا واجب اذا قام به البعض لن يسقط عن الاخرين ..
مبروووووووووك يا خال ليك ولينا ولهم الدرس الجميل[/frame]

[عبدالعزيز خطاب]

ياخال د

مهما طال الليل لابد أن ينجلي ويصبح الصبح.. ويحق الحق ويزهق الباطل..

كنت أنتظر معك هذه النتيجة والقلب مطمئن لنطقها.. والحمد لله أتت كما تمنينا وتوقعنا وإنقلب السحر على أهله..

نجمع كل أفراح ومباركات الكون فى هذا الصباح ونزف بها لك فى طبق من السعادة..

مودتي كاملة

عزيز

[محمد عبدالله محمد موسي]

يحيا العدل

[AMAL]

كل الكلمات لن تسعف ياخال
انه انتصار جديد لسودانيات الخير والجمال
ومناسبة اكيدة للالتفاف حول هذا المكان والاحتفاء به
فهاهو موقف اخر ينضاف لسجل سودانيات ويوثق ويختم بختم العدالة الفرنسية
التي لاتعرف المجاملة ولا المواراة
يالهم من اغبياء وجهلة وصحي الجاهل عدو نفسه
مبروك لنا جميعا هذا النصر فلست وحدك في هذا ولم تكن يوما وحدك ياخالد
دمتا ودامت سودانيات
ومزيد تفاصيل والناس عايزة تعرف من هم نجاة وبولا اصلا
وعلاقتهم بسودانيات
حتي لا يتصور البعض والناس الجديدين تحديدا انه مجرد صراع حزبي
او شئ من هذا القبيل
تحياتي وتبريكاتي للجميع هنا

[أمير الشعراني]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة خالد الحاج

الشكر للدعم المعنوي الكبير من كل الأحباب ولهؤلاء علي الأخص :

دكتورة نجاة محمود (بيان ) .

يا دكتورة
الأفراح أيضاً توحدنا
أطلى علينا وعانقى أفراد اسرتك (سودانيات)
أنتى واحدة منا
حتى فى غياب وجود.

[أسامة الكاشف]

أطلعت يا خال على الرابط في عجالة
تصفحت الصفحات العشرين
لم أجد فيها حقيقة ما يبيح المقاضاة
هي وجهات نظر تستند إلى أدلتها
الملموسة
وتساؤلات مشروعة تتعلق بمنظمات مجتمع مدني
وعمل عام الجميع شركاء فيه
بحكم الانسانية قبل المواطنة
أخذ الخلافات الفكرية والمنهجية إلى سوح القضاء
إرهاب فكري يقصد به التخويف
على وزن إياك أعني يا جارة
محاولة يائسة حتى لا يعيد احد الكرة
وهذا طعن للديمقراطية في مقتل
معا نحو فضاء إسفيري منفتح وشفاف
فضاء يكفل للجميع حق الراي دون شخصنة الخلافات

مبروك تاني ياخال
لأن هذا إنتصار لحرية والرأي قبل أن يكون إنتصاراً شخصيا
على فرية

[أحمد الأمين أحمد]

تم رصد السجال الاسفيرى العنيف بين هذا المنبر ومنبر ناس بولا وحسن موسى ومنبر الاخ بكرى باعتباره من ابرز الاحداث المؤسفه فى الفضاء الثقافى للعام المنصرم 2008 وقد شاركت بدرجه ما فى هذا السجال والان بعد قول القضاء الفرنسى كلمته اقول السبب الاساسى فى تاجيج هذا السجال العنيف هو الاسلوب الاستفزازى والبذاءه المتاصله التى يتعامل بها المدعو حسن موسى احد ثلاثى منبر بولا لان المتابع بدقه لذلك يرى ان حسن موسى يستحيل ان يحترم شخصا يختلف معه فكريا فيعمد عبر الرسوم واللغه المنحطه الى السخريه من ذاك الذى يخالفه بل ان بعض اعضاء منبرهم قد تم فصلهم او اهانتهم عندما تصدوا لحسن موسى الديكتاتور والفنان المضاد ..
الشراره الاساسيه التى اججت ذاك السجال هو سخريه حسن موسى من الشاعر الضخم محمد المكى ابراهيم الذى بعث باقه ورد على شكل مقال فى مقام الشفاء لبولا فغضب حسن موسى واستنكف ان يكون شاعر امتى مكى فى مقام من يدعو الشفاء لبولا فهب الكثيرون فى اكثر من منبر للدفاع عن مكى بل حتى بولا نفسه تدخل فى بوست حسن موسى ولم يجد غضاضه فى موقف محمد المكى ابراهيم لكن حسن موسى لم يرد على مداخلات بولا حتى الراهن ...عليه يمكن القول ان بولا ونجاه ضحيه لمزاج وحده وسوء طبع وبذاءه فنان " مضاد" اسمه حسن موسى لايحترم مخالف فى الرأى مثل حسن الترابى وزمرته ...

[عمار مكى عمر حسن]

خالد

حاولت ان اتابع القضيه منذ فتره ولما لم اكن ملم بكل تفاصيلها اثرت عدم التعليق
على العموم الف مبروك ولك كل التحايا

[3ashig Alneel]

أخونا خالد
تهانينا بالحكم الذي صدر.. وهو قد وضع الأمور في نصابها بشكل سليم
ولكن يبقى مع نشوة الإحساس بالنصر
كثير من أسف على النحو الذي وصل إليه حال مثقفينا من كفر
في العداء .. ومحاولة للتشفي بكل الوسائل المتاحة وغير المتاحة
مهما كانت الدوافع .. كان لدينا قليل من حياء .. بعض من إرتباط كوننا
أهل بلد .. وأنا وأخوي على ....
كل هذه المعاني ذابت ببساطة في هذا الزمن الأليم

لنا الله .. ولهم




ودمــــــــــــت

[عكــود]

[align=center]مبـــــــــــــــروك خالد
مبـــــــــــــــروك أماني
مبــــــــــــــروك سودانيات

[/align]

[احمد سالم]

الاخ خالد الحاج
تحياتى

الان و قد صدر حكم البراءة التمس منك ان تقفل هذا الملف الكريه نهايئا
فاربعتكم (انت, بولا, نجاة, حسن موسى) تنتمون لتيار فكرى واحد امامه قضايا جسام و مهام اصعب و ليس من الحكمة اضاعة جهودكم و وقتكم فى نزاع عبثى لا تستفيد منه سوى قوى معينة تراكم كلكم جميعا اسوا من ابليس اللعين!
كما التمس من الزملاء فى المنتدى, و قد هدات النفوس الا ينكاوا جراحا ارجو ان تكون اندملت و عدم العودة لايام الخصومة العبثية القديمة

[عصمت العالم]

العزيز خالد الحاج..



هذا انتصار للحق الابلج..وحسما قاطعا لكل الاباطيل والاكاذيب..وردا مفحما على الجبناء والمتربصين..وانت تعلم انهم قائمون على ضلاله وباطل..لذا سقطوا وسيظلون فى اسقاط دائما..

هذه الزمره انت اعلم بخباياها وتبجحها وسوء نواياها..

كم اسعدنا هذا التبيان الواضح...والانصاف الحاسم القائم..

الف مبروك..

وها انتصار ربانى الهى خالص...ومتقد

اقفل هذا الملف الكريه نهائيا..

كل الاعزاز

[خالد الحاج]

سلام للأحباب
ألف شكر لكل من كتب هنا حرفا للشكر أو المؤازرة .. سأعود إليكم إن شاء الله ...
هذا الأسبوع أعمل ليلا لذا أعاني من عدم توفر الوقت ...
للذين يتخوفون من فتح باب (النزاع العبثي) مرة أخري أقول لا تتخوفوا فالتجربة أثبتت لي أن لا فائدة ترجي من هؤلاء ولا خير . وشخصيا لارغبة لي في نزاع جديد فقط أريد نشر المعلومة للتأريخ .


هنا صحيفة الاتهام التي يطلبون فيه إدانتي وتدفيعي تكاليف المحاكمة ودفع تعويض لهم مقداره 5000 يرو . مترجمة للإنجليزية : (سأعود لترجمتها للعربية) :

[align=left]Notification of public prosecution abroad
SUMMONDS TO APPEAR BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF PARIS

At the request of:
Madame Nagat; Mohamed Ali (spouse of AHMED BASHIR) born the15/06/53 in Omdurman, of Sudanese nationality, married, translator, address: 10 avenue Charles de Gaulle 78230 LE PECQ.
Monsieur Abdalla AHMED BASHIR born the 01/01/50 in Khartoum (Sudan) of Sudanese nationality, artist, painter, translator (former university professor) married, address 10 avenue Charles de Gaulle 78230 LE PECQ.
Advocate of the Paris bar: address
pigeon hole
Both designate my office as their correspondence address; I undersign the member of partnership appointed by the high court of Paris sitting in Paris and having residence there in the court house. Office of the criminal court process server.
The present document to:
Monsieur Khalid
I serve the present document to anyone as described in the attached document.
List of documents to provide
You will be tried by the criminal court. If you are found guilty the court may hold you liable to a criminal sanction. After the hearing you should appear before the office for enforcement of criminal sanctions to obtain personalised explanation of the decision rendered.
To allow the start of the enforcement of the decision.
Bring the following documents which serve as identification
o ID (your ID card, passport, immigration documents or renewal application)

o Proof of residence

 Electricity bill, rent receipt, telephone bill.
 If you are being hosted - confirmation document from your host.
Copy of your ID and rent receipt of your host.

o Means of payment (cheque book or bank card)

o Driving licence

o Employment contract, if you pursue a professional activity in this case:

 Employer certificate specifying your working hours
 Three latest pay slips.

o Training contract

 certificate from your training organisation specifying your hours

o Government support statements, if you are unemployed or if you are receiving income support.

 Exemption of tax notice.

o Other proof of income

With regard to the jurisdiction of the court
According to article 382 of the Code of Criminal Proceedings the court of the place of the offence has jurisdiction.
This has been acknowledged on the internet by the bailiff residing in Paris. The present criminal court therefore has jurisdiction.
The Facts
Mr AAB and his wife Mrs NMA are creators and managers of a website about Sudan “sudanforall”. As it shows in supporting document number 1 of the bailiff’s report dated 14 May 2008 page 2.
Sudanforall (sudan-forall.org) is the website of a society that the claimants created with a French/Sudanese friend Mr Hassan MUSA... It was registered under the laws of 1901 with the public office of Saint-Germain en-Laye in January 2006.
The discussion forum of the website united students, intellectuals, teachers, active supporters from Sudanese civil society, writers, musicians, artists... who represent the majority of the regional populations and political movements of Sudan. Even though the website was created less than three years ago it has already become the centre for political controversies, arts...
The magazine “Respect” published on the website is widely read in Sudan and used as a reference by several researchers. Approximately 60 writers, academics, lawyers, human rights activists and artists... Both Sudanese and foreigners participated since its first issue in November 2005 and until the last issue in March 2008.
They are targets of insult and defamation led by the manager and owner of a website focused on Sudan who is based in Holland, Mr KE since December 2007.
In fact, it was not until the 11th March 2008 that they were aware of the attack. He rarely visited the website. This was not the first attempt by the manager to damage the reputation of the website.
Through several defamatory accusations Mr KE owner and manager of the website sudan...
 Claims that the plaintiffs have stolen money for Sudanese refugees in France, forcing them to look for protection in other countries. He said in the first place that the money belonging to a society which he named... To then say it is the French branch of a Sudanese organisation for Human rights when in fact as shown in the bank statements, the association does not receive any aids from either the French State or nongovernmental organisations

 Claims that the claimants created the website sudanforall for the purpose of receiving funds from nongovernmental organisations which went into their own pocket.

 Claims that the claimant lied about the real expenses of the website which was to take away the donations from the members of the forum.

 Draws caricatures made up of a number of sketches to say that he lives in a ménage a trios (with their friend, co founder of the society), saying that the woman is disloyal to her naive husband. The drawings talks of extreme vulgarity. He sometimes used personal photos of the plaintiffs which he takes from their profiles in the forum and uses them in his sketches.

 Makes several other insults and lies about them.

It should be noted that Mr AAB asked to be called Abdalla Bola. (See supporting document 11).
II. Arguments
A) On Public Defamation
Defamation is defined under Article 29 of the Act of 29 July 1881 as “any allegation or imputation, which carries out an attack on the honour or the respect of the person or body to whom it has been attributed”. The main elements of this offence are:
-a precise allegation is made
-the determined person, even if they are not expressly named, can be clearly identified
-attacks their honour or their respect
-the nature of the defamation is public
The defamation bears an attack on the integrity and the respectability of a person, by implying precisely:
In this particular case, the affidavit made out by a bailiff on the 9th April 2008 established the libellous remarks described very precisely in the following extracts:
Document No.5 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 9 on 11, the two last paragraphs. Item No.118. Posted on the 23rd February 2008, 3:22 PM by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.6 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 10 on 15 Item No.145. Posted on the 3rd March 2008 at 5:56 PM, by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.7 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 8 on 12 Item No.162. Posted on the 11th March 2008 at 2:39 PM, by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.7 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 10 on 12 Item No.164. Posted on the 11th March 2008 at 4:02 PM , by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.8 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 4/12, last line and page 5/12. Item No.168. Posted on the 13th March 2008 at 10:41 PM, by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.10 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 10 on 16. Item No. 204. Posted on the 23rd March 2008 at 9:05 AM, by Khalid Elhaj.
In the framework of this violation, the guilty intention will always be presumed according to an unbroken line of precedents (Case. Crim. 29 Nov 2004: Bull. crim. No.382), the author of the defamation has an obligation of producing evidence of good faith (Case. crim. 9 Dec. 1997: Dr Pénal 1998).
In matters of defamation, bad faith is presumed. (Trib. inst., Puteaux, 28th September 1999 Gaz. Pal., Rec. 2000, jur p.22)
An official report was established on the 9 April 2008 by Master Yann JEZEQUEL, bailiff.
He points out in his official report:
“There is an older incident of which you can know the distressing details, in telephoning of the veterans of Paris. They acted by naming an organisation for the help of refugees, of which Nagad and Bola, pushed by Nagat, seized for themselves under the pretext of organisation and institutionalism…etc. Then, they stole all that was in this organisation, which, of course, was damaging, and consequently; the refugees were roaming in the neighbouring countries searching for new asylum.
They (Abdalla Bola, Nagat Mohamed Ali and Hassan Musa), my friend, have a history with a smell perceptible to some kilometres. Their smell is certainly not a product of Yves Saint Laurent.”
Document No.5 of the bailiff’s affidavit, page 9 on 11, the last two paragraphs. Item No.118. Posted on the 23rd February 2008, 3:22 PM by Khalid Elhaj.
These remarks contain clearly, from the author, the imputation of doing precisely what causes significant prejudice to the Claimants and carries direct damage to their honour and their respect and since that time it has been non-prescribed.
These remarks demonstrate well the will of Mr El Hassan to tarnish the image of the Claimants.
The bailiff has also noted:
CARTOON
Left speech bubble: “For her, he represents the ego, but it will all be done in a temporary way which looks like an orgasm at the moment of climax, in a Baritone voice [This phrase is deliberately ambiguous].
In the centre: The photo of Hassan Musa on a drawn body that shows his buttocks marked with lipstick.
Right speech bubble: “It’s a style which goes well with the goals of our democratic Forum [the Democratic Forum and this website sudan-forall.org]”
Document No.6 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 10 on 15 Item No.145. Posted on the 3rd March 2008 at 5:56 PM, by Khalid Elhaj.
These remarks clearly contain on the part of their author the imputation of doing precisely what causes significant prejudice to the Claimants and carries direct damage to their honour and their respect and since that time it has been non-prescribed.
These remarks demonstrate well the will of Mr El Hassan to tarnish the image of the Claimants.
Always in the Official report of the 8th April:
CARTOON
Nagad [Nagat] Anonymous International, for the broadcasting of the deception and lies.
The best time for receiving my calls is at 7:00 AM.
Our motto is: We treat our hangover without raw tripe.
[In Sudanese tradition, eating raw tripe in the morning is considered a remedy for hangovers. It is a very serious imputation for a Sudanese woman]
Document No.7 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 3 on 12 Item No.155. Posted on the 7th March 2008 at 9:24 AM by Khalid Elhaj
These remarks clearly contain on the part of their author the imputation of doing precisely what causes significant prejudice to the Claimants and carries direct damage to their honour and their respect and since that time it has been non-prescribed.
These remarks demonstrate well the will of Mr El Hassan to tarnish the image of the Claimants.
Always in the Official report of the 9th April 2008
IMAGE
Devil’s Speech Bubble: “Oh Bula. Is it true? Nagad? [Nagat] My brother, it’s this naivety which made me fall into this trap.”
The transcription N.G.O is and English acronym for Non Governmental Organisation.
Document No.7 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 8 on 12 Item No.162. Posted on the 11th March 2008 at 2:39 PM, by Khalid Elhaj.
These remarks clearly contain on the part of their author the imputation of doing precisely what causes significant prejudice to the Claimants and carries direct damage to their honour and their respect and since that time it has been non-prescribed.
These remarks demonstrate well the will of Mr El Hassan to tarnish the image of the Claimants.
Indeed, a female drunkard in Sudanese society is very badly regarded and lesser respected.
Always in the Official Report of the 9th April 2008,
“I will take my time to come back onto the subject of the organisation, because there are many things to say and to remark.
But staying with this question:
The greatly learned Hassan Musa has asked, by writing, in an item titled “reflection on the support of the site”, the support of the members (of the Forum).
How much does the site cost yearly?
What are the amounts that you have received from members?
At my knowledge the costs are limited in this field and do not exceed the 15 dollars annually. Then, coming to the housing, which has not gone past 60 US dollars a year. As for the graphic design and the work technique, they are assured by some volunteers.
Therefore the annual cost is 75 dollars.
Nagat Mohamed Ali, I am a liar, make me be quiet by showing me your documents. Publish the sums of money you have received and say how you have spent them, honourable woman.
Document No.7 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 10 on 12 Item No.164. Posted on the 11th March 2008 at 4:02 PM , by Khalid Elhaj.
These remarks clearly contain on the part of their author the imputation of doing precisely (accusation of theft of the contributions from the members of the Claimant’s association) what causes significant prejudice to the Claimants and carries direct damage to their honour and their respect and since that time it has been non-prescribed.
In effect, like the display of the lifted notes of the association, the Claimants receive none of the aid of the Non Governmental Organisations.
These remarks demonstrate well the will of Mr El Hassan to tarnish the image of the Claimants.
Always in the Official Report of the 9th April 2008,
CARTOON
I will come back, Bola, on the subject of the organisation. I am patient and I have all my time devoted to you. I hope God allows you good health so they don’t say tomorrow that Khalid El Haj killed them.
High Right: Photos of Bola and Nagat Mohamed Ali.
The Transcription: N.G.O is the English acronym for Non Governmental Organisation.
Comment in Arabic: Memory of History and of Justice.
Document No.8 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 4/12, last line and page 5/12. Item No.168. Posted on the 13th March 2008 at 10:41 PM, by Khalid Elhaj.
These remarks clearly contain on the part of their author the imputation of doing precisely (accusation of links with non Governmental Organisations to fund their association) what causes significant prejudice to the Claimants and carries direct damage to their honour and their respect and since that time it has been non-prescribed.
These remarks demonstrate well the will of Mr El Hassan to tarnish the image of the Claimants.
Always in the Official report of the 9th April 2008,
To begin, I would like to rephrase the questions that remain unanswered:
Quotation:
The learned Hassan Musa has asked, by writing, in an item titled “Reflection on the support of the site”, the support of the members.
How much does the site cost yearly?
What are the amounts that you have received from members?
At my knowledge the costs are limited in this field and do not exceed the 15 dollars annually. Then, there is the housing, which has not gone past 60 US dollars a year. As for the graphic design and the work technique, some volunteers assure them.
Therefore, the annual cost is 75 dollars.
The thieves work in the general interest.
Document No.9 of the Bailiff's affidavit, Page 2/16. Item No.185. Posted on the 16th March 2008 at 2:10 PM by Khalid Elhaj.
The word "Honourable" addressed at a woman has aim of achieving the opposite effect, when used in Sudanese society; moreover, in all the societies in Muslim culture, it has a particular connotation: a lack of chastity.
These remarks clearly contain on the part of their author the imputation of doing precisely (accusation of theft of the member's contributions to the Claimant's society) what causes significant prejudice to the Claimants and carries direct damage to their honour and their respect and since that time it has been non-prescribed.
These remarks demonstrate well the will of Mr El Hassan to tarnish the image of the Claimants.
Always in the Official report of the 9th April 2008,
The thieves work in the general interest.
To begin, I would like to rephrase the questions that remain unanswered:
The greatly learned Hassan Musa has asked, by writing, in an item titled “reflection on the support of the site”, the support of the members (of the Forum).
How much does the site cost yearly?
What are the amounts that you have received from members?
At my knowledge the costs are limited in this field and do not exceed the 15 dollars annually. Then, coming to the housing, which has not gone past 60 US dollars a year. As for the graphic design and the work technique, they are assured by some volunteers.
Therefore the annual cost is 75 dollars.
Nagat Mohamed Ali, I am a liar, make me be quiet by showing me your documents. Publish the sums of money you have received and say how you have spent them, honourable woman.
Document No.10 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 10 on 16. Item No. 204. Posted on the 23rd March 2008 at 9:05 AM, by Khalid Elhaj.
Mr Khalid Elhaj says in extract that appears on this page: Regarding the graphic design (…), the volunteers assure them.
These remarks clearly contain on the part of their author the imputation of doing precisely (accusation of theft of members' contributions from the Claimants' site) what causes significant prejudice to the Claimants and carries direct damage to their honour and their respect and since that time, it has been non-prescribed.
These remarks demonstrate well the will of Mr El Hassan to tarnish the image of the Claimants.
Always in the Official report of the 9th April 2008,
"Mohamed Elmekki Ibrahim, Dr Bola and "the only eye of Oum Salih"."
Author: Khalid Elhaj
Number of posts: 230. No. of versions: 10,727.
[In reading the subject, one understands that Mr Elhaj references an article written by the Sudanese poet Mohamed Elmekki Ibrahim, published in a daily Sudanese newspaper and titled "Abdalla Bola the Sudanese giant". One understands, as well, that he uses the Sudanese proverb "the only eye of Oum Salih" to say that Mr Ahmed Bashir, known as Bola, can only speak on one subject, that is the question of Sudanese identity].
It is about the title of subject No.9 on the list of subjects addressed on the forum of the site sudaniyat.org http://sudanyat.org/vb/forum, which pulled the translated extracts here. This title is at the top of all the pages of items 2 to 10 of the Bailiff's affidavit.
Item No.1 of the Bailiff's affidavit, page 4 on 5.
Abdalla Ahmed Bashir (Abdalla Bola) is a writer and celebrated painter from Sudan. In reference to the article to the article Abdalla Bulla, a Sudanese Giant, Mr Khalid Elhaj means to say that he is not a giant; simply that he is a thief.
One post he dedicated to his allegations. He mocks the importance that Abdalla Bola gives to the question of Sudanese identity. Yet, it is a question that links to the ethnic conflicts and wars, which have devastated and still devastate Sudan. In 1984, Mr Ahmed Bashir argued in a doctorate thesis about Surbonne concerning the question of cultural identity in Africa, using the case of Sudanese identity as an example.
In the official report on the 9thApril 2008, the bailiff notes:
"Nagat Mohamed Ali is a woman who shows maliciousness and stench."
A subtitle that figures on post No.188.
Posted on the 21 March 2008 at 6:15 PM by Khalid Elhaj Item No.9 of the Bailiff's affidavit, page 5/16.
All the remarks are extremely serious.
The offence of defamation is characterised in all these extracts, which suggests that Mr El Hassan acting in defamatory way towards the Claimants. The claimants have been accused of:
- Steeling money that was intended for Sudanese refugees in France, forcing the refugees to search for refuge in other countries.
- Creating their association (Sudan for All) to be funded by Non Governmental Organisations, and that the money is taken by them.
- Lying about the expenses of their site so that they could pick up donations from members of the forum.
- The defendant has also drawn, in caricatures, a number of sketches to suggest that he lives in a threesome (with their friend, co founder of the society), also suggesting that the woman is disloyal to her naive husband.
The arrangements of the Act of the 29th July 1881, which forecast and restrict defamation, do not only protect the persons under their moral consideration, but also in their professional consideration. (Crim. 2nd March 1978, Bull Crim. No.82)
Public Defamation is punishable (12,000 euros fine and 6 months imprisonment, or one of the two penalties) when it is carried out, notably, by visual communication (Articles 23 and 32 of the Act of 1881), the same applies if it is done under a dubious form or if it aims at a person not expressly nominated, from the time that was identified and was possible to terminate it's use.
Public defamation is an intentional offence.
The defamatory remarks were made on these dates: 23rd February 2008, 3rd March 2008, 11th March 2008, 13th March 2008, 21st March 2008.
This why the Claimants registered a complaint against X for defamation, an offence under Articles 29 Paragraph 1 and 32 Paragraph 1 of the Act of the 29th July 1881, and Articles 93-3 paragraph 2 of the Act of the 29 July 1982 and is made up of civil parties.
The prejudice that results from the mentioned defamations against the Claimants is serious because the material is moral.
They are willing to settle as civil parties and base a claim for compensation on the prejudices suffered.
Because of these prejudices, the compensation should not be considered less than €5000.
IV. Costs of procedure
The terms of Article 543 of the Penal Procedure Code:
"Applicable in front of a Police tribunal are Articles 475-1 to 486 and 749 to 762 concerning the costs of justice and expenses, the restitution of the items placed under the hand of justice and the from of judgements.
Notwithstanding, the dispositions of Article 480-1 are only applicable for fines in the 5th class."
Mr Khalid Elhassan is liable to pay a sum of €3000 under Article 475-1 of the Penal Procedure Code.
ON THESE GROUNDS
To say and establish that Mr Khalid Elhassan is liable for the offence of public defamation under Articles 29 paragraph 1 and 32 paragraph 1 of the Act of the 29th July 1881, 93-3 paragraph 2 of Act of the 29th July 1982;
To state which law, on the penal penalty,
On the summons of the public minister:
On the civil interests;
To declare Mrs Nagat Mohamed Ali (ép. Ahmed Bashir) and Mr Abdalla Ahmed Bashir acceptable and well founded in their claim;
In compensation, for the prejudice they have suffered, to sentence Mr Khalid Elhassan to pay the Claimants the sum of 5000 Euros with interest calculated on the day a decision has been reached.
For Mr Khalid to face summons to stop the disputed passages identified by
Document No.5 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 9 on 11, the two last paragraphs. Item No.118. Posted on the 23rd February 2008, 3:22 PM by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.6 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 10 on 15 Item No.145. Posted on the 3rd March 2008 at 5:56 PM, by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.7 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 8 on 12 Item No.162. Posted on the 11th March 2008 at 2:39 PM, by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.7 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 10 on 12 Item No.164. Posted on the 11th March 2008 at 4:02 PM , by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.8 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 4/12, last line and page 5/12. Item No.168. Posted on the 13th March 2008 at 10:41 PM, by Khalid Elhaj.
Document No.10 of the Bailiff’s affidavit, page 10 on 16. Item No. 204. Posted on the 23rd March 2008 at 9:05 AM, by Khalid Elhaj.
Posted on the 21st March 2008 at 6:15 PM by Khalid Elhaj Item No. 9 of the Bailiff's affidavit, page 5/16.
Of the Bailiff's affidavit on the 9th April 2008, and under obligation of 200 Euros per day after a decision has been reached.
To put in place a publication, for the duration of one month after the decision has been made, on the internet site sudanyat.org:
To say, that this publication must be placed at the top of the reception page of the website www.sudanyat.org, on the outside of every promotional insert and without any added mention of anything else, in a wide frame and a third party in the height of the "screen page", in size 14 bold and the font "Times New Roman", the title must be copied in bold letters and in size 14.
For the condemned to pay them the sum of 3000 Euros under Article 475-1 of the Penal Procedure Code as well as the legal expenses.
To order the temporary enforcement, of the decision when it is reached, notwithstanding all the modes of appeal.
TO BE CONFIRMED.
LIST OF ITEMS attached to the Tribunal Case:
Official Report of the 9th April 2008 and the French translation
Official Report of the 14th May 2008 and the French translation
Receipts
Gifts to members of the forum
Bank statements of the association [/align]

[خالد الحاج]

[align=left]

CARTOON
Left speech bubble: “For her, he represents the ego, but it will all be done in a temporary way which looks like an orgasm at the moment of climax, in a Baritone voice [This phrase is deliberately ambiguous].
In the centre: The photo of Hassan Musa on a drawn body that shows his buttocks marked with lipstick

[/align]

يقولون هنا عن رسم كرتوني الآتي :

أن الفقاعة اليسار في هذا الرسم تشير إلي لحظة (الغذف) عند الوصول إلي قمة المتعة الجنسية.
وأن هنالك رسم ل (قبلة) في مؤخرة الرسم الذي يشير إلي حسن موسي. في محاولة للإيحاء الجنسي بينهما.


هنا الرسم الكرتوني المقصود :

[align=center][/align]

وطبعا بالقبلة في مؤخرة حسن موسي هنا أنا أقصد نفاق الصفوة له . والتعبير معروف في اللغة الإنجليزية الأمريكية إذ يقول الأمريكان (Kiss Ass)للدلالة علي التملق لشخص ما .

أما قصدي من الفقاعات فهي عبارة عن (قلوب) ولا علاقة لها ب (الجنس) وما ذهب إليه القوم من (قذف) ولحظة المتعة عند الرجل والكلام الفارغ .

تقبيل القدم معروف في ثقافتنا ولا يحتاج مني شرح وهذا ما عبرت أنه يحدث عندهم مثل منداة نجاة ب (الدكتورة) والنفاق الغريب وموافقتها حتى حين تخطئي .
أما الجملة الواردة من (الحمار) فهي تصوير لما يكتبه الوليد يوسف من (كلام الطير في الباقير) والذي في الغالب لا علاقة له بما يدور .والتعبير أخذته من مداخلتين للوليد يوسف . يعني بالعربي بعض مما يكتبه الوليد وليس من رأسي.

أين الجنس هنا يا قوم ؟؟؟!!
الشكية لله .. أنه اللهاث للبحث عن نصر بأي صورة .

ويشرحون أن في الأمر مساس بشرفهم وتشكيك فيه

[align=left]These remarks clearly contain on the part of their author the imputation of doing precisely what causes significant prejudice to the Claimants and carries direct damage to their honour and their respect and since that time it has been non-prescribed.
These remarks demonstrate well the will of Mr El Hassan to tarnish the image of the Claimants.
Always in the Official report of the 8th April[/align]

هنا صفحة البوست الذي نشرت فيه الكرتون :

http://sudanyat.org/vb/showthread.php?t=6970&page=10