25-06-2012, 03:17 PM
|
#[1]
|
|
:: كــاتب نشــط::
|
هل فقدنا مقومات الثوره في السودان.. ام ان الطبقه المثقفه ليس لديها القدره لي تامل مستقبل مشرق؟
هل فقدنا مقومات الثوره في السودان..
هل فقدنا مقومات الثوره في السودان.. ام ان الطبقه المثقفه ليس لديها القدره لي تامل مستقبل مشرق؟
ام ان التعليم في السودان قد دمر لدرجه انه انتج فراغ فكري بين الاجيال؟
ام انها ثوره البرجوازين ونخبه المثقفون في صراعاتهم الفوقيه، التي ضحيتها المهمشين وقود الثوره؟
ما نراه في السودان الكل متذمر ولكن لايوجد امل ، لان الامل هو عباره عن كوكبه
الاحزاب المتهالكه التي يعلم الشعب قدرتها، فاين البديل؟
ماهي الدوافع التي ادت لقيام الشعب بثوره اكتوبر و الانتفاضه؟ هل نفس الدوافع غائبه ام قد غاب الامل؟
Che Guevara once said
I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves.
The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall..people awareness is the key to revolution
CHANGE?!
To a great extent, the desire for change causes people to revolt. Suffering is a part of this. Essentially, I think that any notion of change comes out of understanding a particular predicament as being bad. Few, if any, have ever waged a revolution when all is well and the Status quo benefits the many. Revolution discourses do not begin with, "Everyone is happy so let's start a revolution." In the end, there is some element of suffering or misery present which helps to foment a revolution. Hand in hand with this would be the desire for change. It is a fine line, but the distinction might be if individuals wish to make things better for others and change the current system, or if they wish to end, or create a perceived end, for their own suffering and pain. Essentially, the question becomes if individuals are engaging in a revolution to cause change amongst others or to end their own suffering. Both go together, but in regards to the question as to why people revolt, perhaps seeing both experiences as different ends of the same desire might assist in providing an answer.
People will revolt if they have a strong leader and a strong belief that the is viable plan for achieving a successful change in their circumstances.
According to the major theory of social movements in political science, rebellions are caused by something called "relative deprivation." They are not caused by suffering -- there have been plenty of suffering people who did not rebel. They are not caused simply by a desire for change (there were plenty of slaves who wanted change and did not rebel). Instead, they are caused by an imbalance between what you have and what you think you can get.
So political scientists say if people are going to rebel, they have to have a reason to feel that they can get better than what they have right now.
http://www.enotes.com/history/discus...t-then-w-87611
التعديل الأخير تم بواسطة عصام اليقين ; 26-06-2012 الساعة 04:09 AM.
|
|
|
|